Pre-Lander Opt-In Form A/B Test: 52% Lift
Shorter questions, quick answer choices, and conversational wording replaced a longer, problem-focused form; the changes were tested as one package.
Read experiment →Experiments
Tests and findings from our experimentation work.
Form Design for Lead Quality, Not Just Volume
Two tests raised submissions by simplifying forms, yet qualification, attendance, or purchase signals worsened. Keep questions that change routing or follow-up and measure outcomes per assigned visitor.
Read experiment →
Webinar Waiting Room A/B Test: What Drives Conversions?
The default 27-second automatic start led both alternatives on reported applications and enrollments; the manual-entry variant also changed layout and copy.
Read experiment →
Relatability A/B Test: Making Visitors Feel Seen
A section built from applicants’ own language had the highest observed rates just before the final CTA, but the primary lift missed the article’s significance threshold.
Read experiment →
Form Merge CRO Case Study: 26% Lift
The treatment folded application questions into booking, removing duplicate fields and the handoff to a second form while keeping the information needed to qualify callers.
Read experiment →
Pricing A/B Test: Trial vs No Trial, $27 vs $17
Early signups favored $17 with a trial; later income reportedly favored $27 without one. Compare equal-age net revenue per assigned visitor before choosing a rollout.
Read experiment →
Testimonial Placement A/B Test: Impact on Conversions
Moving four testimonials near the acceptance choice appeared promising; a separate live-activity widget led on a tripwire page but trailed at checkout.
Read experiment →
Video Length A/B Test: Short vs Long
The six-minute version converted at 7.36% versus 2.94% over 24 hours, but lighter editing and a clearer message changed with length, so duration alone cannot explain the gain.
Read experiment →
Headline Multi-Variant Test: Which Message Won?
A broader promise of luxury beyond travel led the six-way test at 5.24% purchase conversion, but one day and a 72.52% probability make it a candidate for retesting, not a settled winner.
Read experiment →
Video Controls A/B Test: Removing Controls Lowered Opt-Ins
The three-day difference was not statistically significant, so the test challenges the expected benefit of forced viewing without proving a general loss; keep playback accessible by default.
Read experiment →
Radio Buttons vs Multiple CTAs: Impact on Opt-Ins
The selector alone barely changed opt-ins; the full selector, waitlist, and clearer instruction reached 50.14% versus 49.12% for control, without isolating which addition helped.
Read experiment →
Headline A/B Test: Simple vs Complex Copy
The shorter financial-freedom headline reached a 0.43% purchase rate versus 0.20% for a broader perks question; both the promise and length changed.
Read experiment →
Webinar Join Rate A/B Test: Do Shorter Waits Boost Attendance?
Offering a webinar session about two minutes after registration produced more joins than the default wait of up to 15 minutes in this funnel.
Read experiment →
Timestamp A/B Test: Does Time Help or Hurt?
Including “11 AM ET” drew more welcome-page visits than a date alone, but the result was directional and the webinar was prerecorded; future copy should make replay availability clear.
Read experiment →
Testimonial A/B Test: Does Social Proof Boost Conversions?
One testimonial above the footer reached 64.20% opt-ins versus 60.43% with none; three reached 61.99%, so adding more proof did not improve this first-touch page further.
Read experiment →
CTA Button A/B Test: Animation vs No Animation
Removing the repeated wobble raised next-page views from 50.66% to 54.91% over seven days while button copy, position, and destination stayed fixed.
Read experiment →